|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
22/09/2016 |
Actualizado : |
22/09/2016 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Autor : |
CARRACELAS, G.; MARCHESI, C.; LAVECCHIA, A. |
Afiliación : |
JULIO GONZALO CARRACELAS GARRIDO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CLAUDIA ELIZABETH MARCHESI GYERMAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDRES PASCUAL LAVECCHIA GONZALEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Water productivity, irrigation management, and sytematization for rice farming systems in cental region of Uruguay. [Resumen de poster]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
ln: Encuentro de Investigadores de la Región Noreste: Cerro Largo-Rivera-Tacuarembó, 1., 12 de agosto de 2016, Campus Interinstitucional de Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó. Libro de Resúmenes. Tacuarembó: UDELAR; INIA, 2016. |
Páginas : |
p. 53 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Contenido : |
A high proportion of rice farming irrigation in the Central Region of Uruguay is done with water stored in dams. Maximizing water productivity is important as savings in water inputs would reduce pumping irrigation costs, increase rice area planted and allows to allocate water to irrigate other crops in a rotation. The aim of the experiment is to determine irrigation management practices and systematization techniques that increase Water Productivity. This paper includes results of the joint analysis of three seasons (2012-2013-2014). A split plot experimental design trial was conducted in the Experimental Unit located in Tacuarembó (32.11S, 55.10W).
Treatments included two types of systematization with different vertical interval between levees (big plots): I. Conventional (VI-8cm) and II. Alternative (VI-4cm), and three irrigation management practices (small plots): 1. Continuous (C), 2. Intermittent until panicle initiation (IP), and 3. Intermittent during all crop cycle (I). In C a water layer of 10cm is maintained after flooding throughout all the crop cycle. In IP and I the water layer is re-established when the soil is still saturated. Rainfall was above the historical average throughout the crop cycle, 738 mm. Crop was direct drilled on 10th October with 160 kg seed/ha with cultivar INIA Olimar (Indica).
Basal fertilization was 160 kg ha-1 of 19-19-19 (NPK) and Urea was 100 kg ha-1 fractionated at tillering and panicle initiation. Intermittent irrigation (IP and I) in low-infiltration rate soils (planosols) allowed for significant water savings input (35% or 2798 m3 water/ha) without reducing rice grain yield (average = 7713 kg rice/ha) but affecting negatively industrial quality compared to Continuous irrigation (C) (P<0.05). Water productivity considering only irrigated water were: 0.99(c), 1.31(b), 2.00(a) kg grain/m3 water for C, IP and I respectively (P< 0.05). There was no significant effect of systematization in any of the parameters evaluated (P< 0.05). MenosA high proportion of rice farming irrigation in the Central Region of Uruguay is done with water stored in dams. Maximizing water productivity is important as savings in water inputs would reduce pumping irrigation costs, increase rice area planted and allows to allocate water to irrigate other crops in a rotation. The aim of the experiment is to determine irrigation management practices and systematization techniques that increase Water Productivity. This paper includes results of the joint analysis of three seasons (2012-2013-2014). A split plot experimental design trial was conducted in the Experimental Unit located in Tacuarembó (32.11S, 55.10W).
Treatments included two types of systematization with different vertical interval between levees (big plots): I. Conventional (VI-8cm) and II. Alternative (VI-4cm), and three irrigation management practices (small plots): 1. Continuous (C), 2. Intermittent until panicle initiation (IP), and 3. Intermittent during all crop cycle (I). In C a water layer of 10cm is maintained after flooding throughout all the crop cycle. In IP and I the water layer is re-established when the soil is still saturated. Rainfall was above the historical average throughout the crop cycle, 738 mm. Crop was direct drilled on 10th October with 160 kg seed/ha with cultivar INIA Olimar (Indica).
Basal fertilization was 160 kg ha-1 of 19-19-19 (NPK) and Urea was 100 kg ha-1 fractionated at tillering and panicle initiation. Intermittent irrigation (IP and I) i... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
IRRIGATION; RICE; SYSTEMATIZATION; WATER PRODUCTIVITY. |
Thesagro : |
ARROZ. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6093/1/pagina-53.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02827naa a2200217 a 4500 001 1055717 005 2016-09-22 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aCARRACELAS, G. 245 $aWater productivity, irrigation management, and sytematization for rice farming systems in cental region of Uruguay. [Resumen de poster].$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 300 $ap. 53 520 $aA high proportion of rice farming irrigation in the Central Region of Uruguay is done with water stored in dams. Maximizing water productivity is important as savings in water inputs would reduce pumping irrigation costs, increase rice area planted and allows to allocate water to irrigate other crops in a rotation. The aim of the experiment is to determine irrigation management practices and systematization techniques that increase Water Productivity. This paper includes results of the joint analysis of three seasons (2012-2013-2014). A split plot experimental design trial was conducted in the Experimental Unit located in Tacuarembó (32.11S, 55.10W). Treatments included two types of systematization with different vertical interval between levees (big plots): I. Conventional (VI-8cm) and II. Alternative (VI-4cm), and three irrigation management practices (small plots): 1. Continuous (C), 2. Intermittent until panicle initiation (IP), and 3. Intermittent during all crop cycle (I). In C a water layer of 10cm is maintained after flooding throughout all the crop cycle. In IP and I the water layer is re-established when the soil is still saturated. Rainfall was above the historical average throughout the crop cycle, 738 mm. Crop was direct drilled on 10th October with 160 kg seed/ha with cultivar INIA Olimar (Indica). Basal fertilization was 160 kg ha-1 of 19-19-19 (NPK) and Urea was 100 kg ha-1 fractionated at tillering and panicle initiation. Intermittent irrigation (IP and I) in low-infiltration rate soils (planosols) allowed for significant water savings input (35% or 2798 m3 water/ha) without reducing rice grain yield (average = 7713 kg rice/ha) but affecting negatively industrial quality compared to Continuous irrigation (C) (P<0.05). Water productivity considering only irrigated water were: 0.99(c), 1.31(b), 2.00(a) kg grain/m3 water for C, IP and I respectively (P< 0.05). There was no significant effect of systematization in any of the parameters evaluated (P< 0.05). 650 $aARROZ 653 $aIRRIGATION 653 $aRICE 653 $aSYSTEMATIZATION 653 $aWATER PRODUCTIVITY 700 1 $aMARCHESI, C. 700 1 $aLAVECCHIA, A. 773 $tln: Encuentro de Investigadores de la Región Noreste: Cerro Largo-Rivera-Tacuarembó, 1., 12 de agosto de 2016, Campus Interinstitucional de Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó. Libro de Resúmenes. Tacuarembó: UDELAR; INIA, 2016.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registros recuperados : 1 | |
1. | | MONTOSSI, F.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; BRITO, G.; VAZ MARTINS, D.; LUZARDO, S.; DEL CAMPO, M.; FERNANDEZ, E.; HELGUERA, L.; LA MANNA, A.; DE BARBIERI, I.; NOLLA, M.; MESSA, A.; VON ACHENBACH, A.; CASTRO, L.; ROBAINA, R. Conociendo la aceptación de nuestras carnes ovinas y bovinas en Europa Revista INIA, 2005, no. 5, p. 47-48Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|